Monday, February 20, 2012

KS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Been a long while since i wrote on here, was reading on the Kansas defenders blog about a man who had his case reversed due to judicial error in NOT allowing the criminal defendant to go pro se.
Been busy but i am back the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights § 10 reads as follows:

§ 10. "In all prosecutions, the accused shall be allowed to appear and defend in person, or by counsel;
Now what is wrong with this picture of the Kansas Courts NOT allowing a criminal defendant to proceed PRO SE, a most recent famous case Indiana -v- Edwards a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with a person who wanted to proceed pro se, was found COMPETENT to stand trial, but NOT so much in regards to representing himself.
Now all of the cases both state and federal, that i have read over these past years always refer to the U.S. Constitution and the 6th Amendment. in which the language is more lenient in regards to the assistance of counsel. And that has been interpreted as meaning that one could represent himself as set forth in the landmark case of FARETTA -v- CALIF 1975 case.
However i guess these appellate lawyers have not read the Kansas Const. bill of rights that i mention previously.
If there is anyone who reads this respond with your comments to rabbi.josiah@gmail.com

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

here is a link i found

http://poedpatriot.blogspot.com/
Has anyone wonder why the NEW DICTATOR HUSSIN OBAMA is so against the constitution and capitalism so do i
i was able to secure a copy of the book by saul alinsky: primer for radicials and this dictator hussin obama is following that play book right down to the letter of saul alinsky dictates
more later

TEA PARTYS AND THE CONSTITUTION

Greetings fellow tea party goers, i am new at this blogging and twittering so bear with me, i will have links to other sites of tea party and constitutional sites

UNDER CONSTRUCTION